enhanced_llm_v1
Generated: 2025-09-04
Scenario: Review of Other Engineer’s Work
Scenario Overview
Generated Timeline: 5 events and 1 decisions extracted from case analysis.
Participants:
Client A
Engineer B
City Administrator
Engineer C
MCP server unavailable during generation - running
without ontology enrichment
ProEthica Categories Extracted
Elements identified according to the formal model D = (R, P, O, S, Rs, A, E, Ca, Cs)Role (0)
No roles identified in this case
Principle (0)
No principles identified in this case
Obligation (0)
No obligations identified in this case
State (0)
No states identified in this case
Resource (0)
No resources identified in this case
Action (0)
No actions identified in this case
Event (0)
No events identified in this case
Capability (0)
No capabilitys identified in this case
Constraint (0)
No constraints identified in this case
Event Timeline
5 timeline items
Event
Decision
Event #1
Event #2
Event #3
Event #4
Decision Point #decision_1
QUESTIONS and DISCUSSIONShould Engineer C provide critical assessment of Engineer B's work performance when directly asked by the City Administrator while Engineer B is still under active contract?
Ontology Categories:
['Role', 'Obligation', 'Action', 'Constraint', 'Principle']
Temporal Context: During active contract period of competitor, When directly questioned by decision-making authority, Prior to contract renewal/selection process
Participants & Roles
Client A
Participant
Engineer B
Participant
City Administrator
Participant
Engineer C
Participant
Generation Details
- Pipeline Version:
-
enhanced_llm_v1Enhanced - Generated:
- 2025-09-04 15:58:23
- Version:
- #1
- Content Hash:
82bc276054b3
- Statistics:
-
Events: 5
Decisions: 1
Timeline Events: 4
Temporal Evidence: 14
Participants: 4 - Extraction:
- llm_model: claude-sonnet-4-20250514 generated_at: 2025-09-04T15:58:22.737655 feature_flags: {'enhanced_timeline': True, 'temporal_evidence': True, 'semantic_decisions': True} evidence_sources: 14