20 entities 3 actions 5 events 5 causal chains 6 temporal relations
Timeline Overview
Action Event 8 sequenced markers
Competency Shortcut Purchase After receiving the solicitation, before offering new services
Solicitation Receipt Before CD-ROM purchase; initial contact point
CD-ROM Delivery After Competency Shortcut Purchase; before service offering begins
Promotional Material Acceptance Prior to ordering the CD-ROM
Unauthorized Service Offering After ordering the CD-ROM
Competency Gap Exposure Predates the case narrative; becomes salient at point of solicitation receipt
Inadequate Competency Basis At point of service offering; persists throughout
Ethical Precedent Application At point of analysis; retroactively applicable from service offering onward
OWL-Time Temporal Structure 6 relations time: = w3.org/2006/time
Engineer A lacking facilities design experience time:intervalBefore Engineer A receiving the CD-ROM solicitation
Engineer A receiving the CD-ROM solicitation time:intervalBefore Engineer A ordering the CD-ROM
Engineer A ordering the CD-ROM time:intervalBefore Engineer A offering facilities design and construction services
design/build project work by Engineer A time:intervalOverlaps structural footing design by Engineer B
Engineer B's structural footing design time:intervalDuring construction of the industrial facility
consulting firm's interview with public utility time:intervalBefore firm's attempt to alter its qualifications
Extracted Actions (3)
Volitional professional decisions with intentions and ethical context

Description: Engineer A, a chemical engineer with no facilities design or construction experience, receives and engages with a direct mail solicitation claiming that a CD-ROM can substitute for substantive engineering education and experience in unfamiliar disciplines.

Temporal Marker: Prior to ordering the CD-ROM instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (2)
  • Competency Gap Awareness State
  • Susceptibility to Self-Certification State

Mental State: receptive and credulous

Intended Outcome: Identify a means to expand practice into new engineering service areas

Foreseen Unintended Effects:

  • Acceptance of a false premise that technology can replace substantive competency development
Obligation Engagement:
At stake (1)
  • Obligation to Practice Within Competency
Guided By Principles:
  • Protection of Public Health and Safety
  • Professional Judgment Over Technology Shortcuts
Required Capabilities:
Critical evaluation of professional development claims Self-assessment of competency boundaries
Within Competence: No
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • guidedByPrinciple: Protection of Public Health and Safety; Professional Judgment Over Technology Shortcuts
  • initiates: Competency Gap Awareness State; Susceptibility to Self-Certification State
  • raisesObligation: Obligation to Practice Within Competency
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Engineer A, a chemical engineer with no facilities design or construction experience, receives and engages with a direct mail solicitation claiming that a CD-ROM can substitute for substantive engineering education and experience in unfamiliar disciplines.
  • hasAgent content: Engineer A
  • temporalMarker content: Prior to ordering the CD-ROM
  • eventRoleContext content: chemical engineer
  • hasMentalState content: receptive and credulous
  • intendedOutcome content: Identify a means to expand practice into new engineering service areas
  • foreseenUnintendedEffects content: Acceptance of a false premise that technology can replace substantive competency development
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 3
  • withinCompetence assessment: False
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • requiresCapability: Critical evaluation of professional development claims; Self-assessment of competency boundaries
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Action_Promotional_Material_Acceptance",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A, a chemical engineer with no facilities design or construction experience, receives and engages with a direct mail solicitation claiming that a CD-ROM can substitute for substantive engineering education and experience in unfamiliar disciplines.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "chemical engineer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Acceptance of a false premise that technology can replace substantive competency development"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Protection of Public Health and Safety",
    "Professional Judgment Over Technology Shortcuts"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "receptive and credulous",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Competency Gap Awareness State",
    "Susceptibility to Self-Certification State"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Identify a means to expand practice into new engineering service areas",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [
    "Obligation to Practice Within Competency"
  ],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Critical evaluation of professional development claims",
    "Self-assessment of competency boundaries"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Prior to ordering the CD-ROM",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 3,
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": false,
  "rdfs:label": "Promotional Material Acceptance"
}

Description: Engineer A orders the CD-ROM, implicitly accepting its premise that pointing and clicking through a software library constitutes a sufficient basis for professional competency in facilities design and construction across civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering domains.

Temporal Marker: After receiving the solicitation, before offering new services instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (2)
  • Self-Certification State
  • Unqualified Practice Preparation State
Terminates (1)
  • Competency Gap Awareness State

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Acquire a tool perceived as enabling expansion into facilities design and construction services to increase firm profits

Foreseen Unintended Effects:

  • Self-certification of competency without substantive qualification
  • Potential exposure of future clients and the public to unqualified engineering services
Obligation Engagement:
At stake (1)
  • Obligation to Practice Within Competency
Violates (1)
  • Obligation to Represent Qualifications Honestly
Guided By Principles:
  • Protection of Public Health and Safety
  • Professional Judgment Over Technology Shortcuts
  • Rigorous Credentialing Over Self-Certification
Required Capabilities:
Substantive engineering education in civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering Demonstrated facilities design and construction experience Engineering judgment developed through time-tested practice
Within Competence: No
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • violatesObligation: Obligation to Represent Qualifications Honestly
  • guidedByPrinciple: Protection of Public Health and Safety; Professional Judgment Over Technology Shortcuts; Rigorous Credentialing Over Self-Certification
  • initiates: Self-Certification State; Unqualified Practice Preparation State
  • terminates: Competency Gap Awareness State
  • raisesObligation: Obligation to Practice Within Competency
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Engineer A orders the CD-ROM, implicitly accepting its premise that pointing and clicking through a software library constitutes a sufficient basis for professional competency in facilities design and construction across civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering domains.
  • hasAgent content: Engineer A
  • temporalMarker content: After receiving the solicitation, before offering new services
  • eventRoleContext content: chemical engineer
  • hasMentalState content: deliberate
  • intendedOutcome content: Acquire a tool perceived as enabling expansion into facilities design and construction services to increase firm profits
  • foreseenUnintendedEffects content: Self-certification of competency without substantive qualification; Potential exposure of future clients and the public to unqualified engineering services
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 4
  • withinCompetence assessment: False
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • requiresCapability: Substantive engineering education in civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering; Demonstrated facilities design and construction experience; Engineering judgment developed through time-tested practice
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Action_Competency_Shortcut_Purchase",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A orders the CD-ROM, implicitly accepting its premise that pointing and clicking through a software library constitutes a sufficient basis for professional competency in facilities design and construction across civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering domains.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "chemical engineer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Self-certification of competency without substantive qualification",
    "Potential exposure of future clients and the public to unqualified engineering services"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Protection of Public Health and Safety",
    "Professional Judgment Over Technology Shortcuts",
    "Rigorous Credentialing Over Self-Certification"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Self-Certification State",
    "Unqualified Practice Preparation State"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Acquire a tool perceived as enabling expansion into facilities design and construction services to increase firm profits",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [
    "Obligation to Practice Within Competency"
  ],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Substantive engineering education in civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering",
    "Demonstrated facilities design and construction experience",
    "Engineering judgment developed through time-tested practice"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After receiving the solicitation, before offering new services",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 4,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Competency Gap Awareness State"
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [
    "Obligation to Represent Qualifications Honestly"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": false,
  "rdfs:label": "Competency Shortcut Purchase"
}

Description: Engineer A begins actively marketing and providing facilities design and construction services to clients, relying solely on the CD-ROM as the basis for his claimed competency, despite having no relevant education or experience in that domain.

Temporal Marker: After ordering the CD-ROM interval

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (3)
  • Public Safety Risk State
  • Unqualified Practice Active State
  • Client Reliance on Unqualified Engineer State
Terminates (1)
  • Unqualified Practice Preparation State

Mental State: deliberate

Intended Outcome: Expand the firm's service portfolio and increase profits by capturing construction project work that would otherwise be declined

Foreseen Unintended Effects:

  • Exposure of clients and the public to unqualified engineering design
  • Misrepresentation of professional competency to prospective clients
  • Risk of harm to public health and safety from deficient design work
Obligation Engagement:
Violates (4)
  • Obligation to Practice Within Competency
  • Obligation to Represent Qualifications Honestly
  • Obligation to Protect Public Health and Safety
  • Obligation to Retain Qualified Specialists When Lacking Competency
Guided By Principles:
  • Protection of Public Health and Safety
  • Professional Judgment Over Technology Shortcuts
  • Rigorous Credentialing Over Self-Certification
  • Ethical Obligation to Seek Work Only Within Areas of Competency
Required Capabilities:
Civil engineering education and experience Structural engineering education and experience Mechanical and electrical engineering knowledge for facilities Foundation and footing design expertise Engineering judgment developed through substantive practice in facilities design and construction
Within Competence: No
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • violatesObligation: Obligation to Practice Within Competency; Obligation to Represent Qualifications Honestly; Obligation to Protect Public Health and Safety; Obligation to Retain Qualified Specialists When Lacking Competency
  • guidedByPrinciple: Protection of Public Health and Safety; Professional Judgment Over Technology Shortcuts; Rigorous Credentialing Over Self-Certification; Ethical Obligation to Seek Work Only Within Areas of Competency
  • initiates: Public Safety Risk State; Unqualified Practice Active State; Client Reliance on Unqualified Engineer State
  • terminates: Unqualified Practice Preparation State
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Engineer A begins actively marketing and providing facilities design and construction services to clients, relying solely on the CD-ROM as the basis for his claimed competency, despite having no relevant education or experience in that domain.
  • hasAgent content: Engineer A
  • temporalMarker content: After ordering the CD-ROM
  • eventRoleContext content: chemical engineer
  • hasMentalState content: deliberate
  • intendedOutcome content: Expand the firm's service portfolio and increase profits by capturing construction project work that would otherwise be declined
  • foreseenUnintendedEffects content: Exposure of clients and the public to unqualified engineering design; Misrepresentation of professional competency to prospective clients; Risk of harm to public health and safety from deficient design work
  • temporalExtent content: interval
  • temporalSequence content: 6
  • withinCompetence assessment: False
Derived (reconstructable from the graph)
  • requiresCapability: Civil engineering education and experience; Structural engineering education and experience; Mechanical and electrical engineering knowledge for facilities; Foundation and footing design expertise; Engineering judgment developed through substantive practice in facilities design and construction
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Action_Unauthorized_Service_Offering",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A begins actively marketing and providing facilities design and construction services to clients, relying solely on the CD-ROM as the basis for his claimed competency, despite having no relevant education or experience in that domain.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "chemical engineer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Exposure of clients and the public to unqualified engineering design",
    "Misrepresentation of professional competency to prospective clients",
    "Risk of harm to public health and safety from deficient design work"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Protection of Public Health and Safety",
    "Professional Judgment Over Technology Shortcuts",
    "Rigorous Credentialing Over Self-Certification",
    "Ethical Obligation to Seek Work Only Within Areas of Competency"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Public Safety Risk State",
    "Unqualified Practice Active State",
    "Client Reliance on Unqualified Engineer State"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Expand the firm\u0027s service portfolio and increase profits by capturing construction project work that would otherwise be declined",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Civil engineering education and experience",
    "Structural engineering education and experience",
    "Mechanical and electrical engineering knowledge for facilities",
    "Foundation and footing design expertise",
    "Engineering judgment developed through substantive practice in facilities design and construction"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After ordering the CD-ROM",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 6,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Unqualified Practice Preparation State"
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [
    "Obligation to Practice Within Competency",
    "Obligation to Represent Qualifications Honestly",
    "Obligation to Protect Public Health and Safety",
    "Obligation to Retain Qualified Specialists When Lacking Competency"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": false,
  "rdfs:label": "Unauthorized Service Offering"
}
Extracted Events (5)
Occurrences that trigger ethical considerations and state changes

Description: Engineer A's lack of facilities design and construction experience became a material condition of the case once the CD-ROM solicitation was received and acted upon, establishing the foundational competency deficit relevant to all subsequent events.

Temporal Marker: Predates the case narrative; becomes salient at point of solicitation receipt interval

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (2)
  • Competency Deficit Active
  • Professional Boundary Condition

Causes State Change: Engineer A's professional competency boundary became a relevant and active constraint on any subsequent service offering in facilities design and construction.

Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • initiates: Competency Deficit Active; Professional Boundary Condition
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Engineer A's lack of facilities design and construction experience became a material condition of the case once the CD-ROM solicitation was received and acted upon, establishing the foundational competency deficit relevant to all subsequent events.
  • temporalMarker content: Predates the case narrative; becomes salient at point of solicitation receipt
  • eventType content: automatic_trigger
  • causesStateChange content: Engineer A's professional competency boundary became a relevant and active constraint on any subsequent service offering in facilities design and construction.
  • temporalExtent content: interval
  • temporalSequence content: 1
  • severity assessment: high
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Event_Competency_Gap_Exposure",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Engineer A\u0027s professional competency boundary became a relevant and active constraint on any subsequent service offering in facilities design and construction.",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A\u0027s lack of facilities design and construction experience became a material condition of the case once the CD-ROM solicitation was received and acted upon, establishing the foundational competency deficit relevant to all subsequent events.",
  "proeth:eventType": "automatic_trigger",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Competency Deficit Active",
    "Professional Boundary Condition"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "high",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Predates the case narrative; becomes salient at point of solicitation receipt",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 1,
  "rdfs:label": "Competency Gap Exposure"
}

Description: Engineer A received a direct mail solicitation advertising a CD-ROM product claiming to enable any engineer to design and cost out construction projects regardless of prior experience.

Temporal Marker: Before CD-ROM purchase; initial contact point instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (1)
  • Awareness of Competency Shortcut Product

Causes State Change: Engineer A became aware of a product marketing itself as a competency substitute for facilities design and construction work.

Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • initiates: Awareness of Competency Shortcut Product
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Engineer A received a direct mail solicitation advertising a CD-ROM product claiming to enable any engineer to design and cost out construction projects regardless of prior experience.
  • temporalMarker content: Before CD-ROM purchase; initial contact point
  • eventType content: exogenous
  • causesStateChange content: Engineer A became aware of a product marketing itself as a competency substitute for facilities design and construction work.
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 2
  • severity assessment: low
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Event_Solicitation_Receipt",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Engineer A became aware of a product marketing itself as a competency substitute for facilities design and construction work.",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer A received a direct mail solicitation advertising a CD-ROM product claiming to enable any engineer to design and cost out construction projects regardless of prior experience.",
  "proeth:eventType": "exogenous",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Awareness of Competency Shortcut Product"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "low",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Before CD-ROM purchase; initial contact point",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 2,
  "rdfs:label": "Solicitation Receipt"
}

Description: Following Engineer A's order, the CD-ROM product was delivered, making the tool physically available for use as an attempted basis for competency in facilities design and construction work.

Temporal Marker: After Competency Shortcut Purchase; before service offering begins instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (2)
  • CD-ROM Tool Available
  • Perceived Competency Basis Present
Terminates (1)
  • Awareness of Competency Shortcut Product

Causes State Change: The CD-ROM became available to Engineer A as a tool, creating the proximate condition enabling the subsequent service offering.

Caused By Action: Action_Competency_Shortcut_Purchase

Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • causedByAction: http://proethica.org/cases/121#Action_Competency_Shortcut_Purchase
  • initiates: CD-ROM Tool Available; Perceived Competency Basis Present
  • terminates: Awareness of Competency Shortcut Product
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Following Engineer A's order, the CD-ROM product was delivered, making the tool physically available for use as an attempted basis for competency in facilities design and construction work.
  • temporalMarker content: After Competency Shortcut Purchase; before service offering begins
  • eventType content: outcome
  • causesStateChange content: The CD-ROM became available to Engineer A as a tool, creating the proximate condition enabling the subsequent service offering.
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 5
  • severity assessment: medium
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Event_CD-ROM_Delivery",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Action_Competency_Shortcut_Purchase",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "The CD-ROM became available to Engineer A as a tool, creating the proximate condition enabling the subsequent service offering.",
  "proeth:description": "Following Engineer A\u0027s order, the CD-ROM product was delivered, making the tool physically available for use as an attempted basis for competency in facilities design and construction work.",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "CD-ROM Tool Available",
    "Perceived Competency Basis Present"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "medium",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After Competency Shortcut Purchase; before service offering begins",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 5,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Awareness of Competency Shortcut Product"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "CD-ROM Delivery"
}

Description: Once Engineer A relied on the CD-ROM as the foundation for offering facilities design and construction services, the resulting competency basis became ethically and technically inadequate under established professional standards, as confirmed by prior BER precedents from 1971, 1978, and 1994.

Temporal Marker: At point of service offering; persists throughout interval

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (3)
  • Inadequate Competency State
  • Client Reliance Risk
  • Professional Standards Violation Active

Causes State Change: Engineer A's professional standing in the facilities design domain became ethically compromised, placing any client engaging those services at potential risk.

Caused By Action: Action_Unauthorized_Service_Offering

Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • causedByAction: http://proethica.org/cases/121#Action_Unauthorized_Service_Offering
  • initiates: Inadequate Competency State; Client Reliance Risk; Professional Standards Violation Active
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Once Engineer A relied on the CD-ROM as the foundation for offering facilities design and construction services, the resulting competency basis became ethically and technically inadequate under established professional standards, as confirmed by prior BER precedents from 1971, 1978, and 1994.
  • temporalMarker content: At point of service offering; persists throughout
  • eventType content: automatic_trigger
  • causesStateChange content: Engineer A's professional standing in the facilities design domain became ethically compromised, placing any client engaging those services at potential risk.
  • temporalExtent content: interval
  • temporalSequence content: 7
  • severity assessment: high
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Event_Inadequate_Competency_Basis",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Action_Unauthorized_Service_Offering",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Engineer A\u0027s professional standing in the facilities design domain became ethically compromised, placing any client engaging those services at potential risk.",
  "proeth:description": "Once Engineer A relied on the CD-ROM as the foundation for offering facilities design and construction services, the resulting competency basis became ethically and technically inadequate under established professional standards, as confirmed by prior BER precedents from 1971, 1978, and 1994.",
  "proeth:eventType": "automatic_trigger",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Inadequate Competency State",
    "Client Reliance Risk",
    "Professional Standards Violation Active"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "high",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "At point of service offering; persists throughout",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 7,
  "rdfs:label": "Inadequate Competency Basis"
}

Description: Prior BER case decisions from 1971, 1978, and 1994 automatically became applicable to Engineer A's situation once the facts of the case matched the established patterns of competency-based ethical violations, triggering their normative force without any further agent decision.

Temporal Marker: At point of analysis; retroactively applicable from service offering onward instant

Fluent Transitions:
Initiates (2)
  • Precedent Binding State
  • Ethics Violation Confirmed

Causes State Change: Established professional ethics precedents became normatively binding on Engineer A's conduct, framing the service offering as ethically impermissible under existing standards.

Caused By Action: Action_Unauthorized_Service_Offering

Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • causedByAction: http://proethica.org/cases/121#Action_Unauthorized_Service_Offering
  • initiates: Precedent Binding State; Ethics Violation Confirmed
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • description content: Prior BER case decisions from 1971, 1978, and 1994 automatically became applicable to Engineer A's situation once the facts of the case matched the established patterns of competency-based ethical violations, triggering their normative force without any further agent decision.
  • temporalMarker content: At point of analysis; retroactively applicable from service offering onward
  • eventType content: automatic_trigger
  • causesStateChange content: Established professional ethics precedents became normatively binding on Engineer A's conduct, framing the service offering as ethically impermissible under existing standards.
  • temporalExtent content: instant
  • temporalSequence content: 8
  • severity assessment: medium
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Event_Ethical_Precedent_Application",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#Action_Unauthorized_Service_Offering",
  "proeth:causesStateChange": "Established professional ethics precedents became normatively binding on Engineer A\u0027s conduct, framing the service offering as ethically impermissible under existing standards.",
  "proeth:description": "Prior BER case decisions from 1971, 1978, and 1994 automatically became applicable to Engineer A\u0027s situation once the facts of the case matched the established patterns of competency-based ethical violations, triggering their normative force without any further agent decision.",
  "proeth:eventType": "automatic_trigger",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Precedent Binding State",
    "Ethics Violation Confirmed"
  ],
  "proeth:severity": "medium",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "At point of analysis; retroactively applicable from service offering onward",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 8,
  "rdfs:label": "Ethical Precedent Application"
}
Causal Chains (5)
NESS test analysis: Necessary Element of Sufficient Set

Causal Language: A CD-ROM that permits virtually anyone to “specify, design and cost out” a project clearly is not an appropriate basis upon which an individual can obtain professional competency to perform facilities design and construction services.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Engineer A's reliance on the CD-ROM as the foundation for offering services
  • Engineer A's lack of appropriate engineering education and experience in facilities design
  • The CD-ROM being an inappropriate substitute for professional competency
Sufficient Factors:
  • Reliance on a 'how to' CD-ROM in place of education and experience to offer professional services
Counterfactual Test: If Engineer A had obtained appropriate education and experience or retained qualified specialists, the competency basis would have been adequate
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Engineer A
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Unauthorized Service Offering
    Engineer A markets and provides facilities design services
  2. Competency Gap Exposure
    Engineer A's lack of facilities design experience becomes a material condition of the engagement
  3. Inadequate Competency Basis
    The CD-ROM is established as an inappropriate foundation for professional competency, amounting to 'self-certifying' competency
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Unauthorized Service Offering
  • effect: Inadequate Competency Basis
  • responsibleAgent: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: A CD-ROM that permits virtually anyone to “specify, design and cost out” a project clearly is not an appropriate basis upon which an individual can obtain professional competency to perform facilities design and construction services.
  • necessaryFactors content: Engineer A's reliance on the CD-ROM as the foundation for offering services; Engineer A's lack of appropriate engineering education and experience in facilities design; The CD-ROM being an inappropriate substitute for professional competency
  • sufficientFactors content: Reliance on a 'how to' CD-ROM in place of education and experience to offer professional services
  • counterfactual content: If Engineer A had obtained appropriate education and experience or retained qualified specialists, the competency basis would have been adequate
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Unauthorized Service Offering', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A markets and provides facilities design services'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Competency Gap Exposure', 'proeth:description': "Engineer A's lack of facilities design experience becomes a material condition of the engagement"}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'Inadequate Competency Basis', 'proeth:description': "The CD-ROM is established as an inappropriate foundation for professional competency, amounting to 'self-certifying' competency"}
  • responsibilityType assessment: direct
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#CausalChain_6a521af9",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "A CD-ROM that permits virtually anyone to \u201cspecify, design and cost out\u201d a project clearly is not an appropriate basis upon which an individual can obtain professional competency to perform facilities design and construction services.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A markets and provides facilities design services",
      "proeth:element": "Unauthorized Service Offering",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A\u0027s lack of facilities design experience becomes a material condition of the engagement",
      "proeth:element": "Competency Gap Exposure",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "The CD-ROM is established as an inappropriate foundation for professional competency, amounting to \u0027self-certifying\u0027 competency",
      "proeth:element": "Inadequate Competency Basis",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Unauthorized Service Offering",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "If Engineer A had obtained appropriate education and experience or retained qualified specialists, the competency basis would have been adequate",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:effect": "Inadequate Competency Basis",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer A\u0027s reliance on the CD-ROM as the foundation for offering services",
    "Engineer A\u0027s lack of appropriate engineering education and experience in facilities design",
    "The CD-ROM being an inappropriate substitute for professional competency"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Reliance on a \u0027how to\u0027 CD-ROM in place of education and experience to offer professional services"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: engineers have an ethical obligation to seek work only in areas where they possess educational background and experience or to retain individuals who possess the necessary educational background and experience to perform the work.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Engineer A offering services outside his area of competence
  • Existence of prior BER decisions (71-2, 78-5, 94-8) addressing professional competency
  • Code Section II.2.a governing competence
Sufficient Factors:
  • An engineer practicing outside competency + existing precedent on competency obligations
Counterfactual Test: Had Engineer A not offered services outside his competency, the competency precedents would not be triggered for evaluation of his conduct
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Engineer A
Type: shared
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Unauthorized Service Offering
    Engineer A offers facilities design and construction services outside his competency
  2. Ethical Precedent Application
    Prior BER decisions from 1971, 1978, and 1994 become applicable to Engineer A's situation
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Unauthorized Service Offering
  • effect: Ethical Precedent Application
  • responsibleAgent: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: engineers have an ethical obligation to seek work only in areas where they possess educational background and experience or to retain individuals who possess the necessary educational background and experience to perform the work.
  • necessaryFactors content: Engineer A offering services outside his area of competence; Existence of prior BER decisions (71-2, 78-5, 94-8) addressing professional competency; Code Section II.2.a governing competence
  • sufficientFactors content: An engineer practicing outside competency + existing precedent on competency obligations
  • counterfactual content: Had Engineer A not offered services outside his competency, the competency precedents would not be triggered for evaluation of his conduct
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Unauthorized Service Offering', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A offers facilities design and construction services outside his competency'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Ethical Precedent Application', 'proeth:description': "Prior BER decisions from 1971, 1978, and 1994 become applicable to Engineer A's situation"}
  • responsibilityType assessment: shared
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#CausalChain_3130f76a",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "engineers have an ethical obligation to seek work only in areas where they possess educational background and experience or to retain individuals who possess the necessary educational background and experience to perform the work.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A offers facilities design and construction services outside his competency",
      "proeth:element": "Unauthorized Service Offering",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Prior BER decisions from 1971, 1978, and 1994 become applicable to Engineer A\u0027s situation",
      "proeth:element": "Ethical Precedent Application",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Unauthorized Service Offering",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Had Engineer A not offered services outside his competency, the competency precedents would not be triggered for evaluation of his conduct",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:effect": "Ethical Precedent Application",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer A offering services outside his area of competence",
    "Existence of prior BER decisions (71-2, 78-5, 94-8) addressing professional competency",
    "Code Section II.2.a governing competence"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "shared",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "An engineer practicing outside competency + existing precedent on competency obligations"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: Engineer A orders the CD-ROM and begins to offer facilities design and construction services.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Engineer A's act of ordering the CD-ROM
  • Existence of the product available for delivery
Sufficient Factors:
  • Placement of the order + vendor fulfillment process
Counterfactual Test: Without ordering the CD-ROM, the product would never have been delivered to Engineer A
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Engineer A
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Competency Shortcut Purchase
    Engineer A orders the CD-ROM
  2. CD-ROM Delivery
    The CD-ROM product is delivered, making the tool physically available
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Competency Shortcut Purchase
  • effect: CD-ROM Delivery
  • responsibleAgent: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: Engineer A orders the CD-ROM and begins to offer facilities design and construction services.
  • necessaryFactors content: Engineer A's act of ordering the CD-ROM; Existence of the product available for delivery
  • sufficientFactors content: Placement of the order + vendor fulfillment process
  • counterfactual content: Without ordering the CD-ROM, the product would never have been delivered to Engineer A
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Competency Shortcut Purchase', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A orders the CD-ROM'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'CD-ROM Delivery', 'proeth:description': 'The CD-ROM product is delivered, making the tool physically available'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: direct
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#CausalChain_420432fd",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer A orders the CD-ROM and begins to offer facilities design and construction services.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A orders the CD-ROM",
      "proeth:element": "Competency Shortcut Purchase",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "The CD-ROM product is delivered, making the tool physically available",
      "proeth:element": "CD-ROM Delivery",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Competency Shortcut Purchase",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without ordering the CD-ROM, the product would never have been delivered to Engineer A",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "CD-ROM Delivery",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer A\u0027s act of ordering the CD-ROM",
    "Existence of the product available for delivery"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Placement of the order + vendor fulfillment process"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: Engineer A orders the CD-ROM and begins to offer facilities design and construction services.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Physical availability of the CD-ROM tool
  • Engineer A's intent to enter the facilities design and construction market
  • Engineer A's reliance on the CD-ROM as his competency basis
Sufficient Factors:
  • Possession of the tool + Engineer A's decision to market services he believed it enabled
Counterfactual Test: Without the delivered CD-ROM as the foundation, Engineer A would have lacked even the purported basis to begin offering these services
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Engineer A
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. CD-ROM Delivery
    The CD-ROM is delivered and physically available
  2. Unauthorized Service Offering
    Engineer A begins actively marketing and providing facilities design and construction services
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: CD-ROM Delivery
  • effect: Unauthorized Service Offering
  • responsibleAgent: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: Engineer A orders the CD-ROM and begins to offer facilities design and construction services.
  • necessaryFactors content: Physical availability of the CD-ROM tool; Engineer A's intent to enter the facilities design and construction market; Engineer A's reliance on the CD-ROM as his competency basis
  • sufficientFactors content: Possession of the tool + Engineer A's decision to market services he believed it enabled
  • counterfactual content: Without the delivered CD-ROM as the foundation, Engineer A would have lacked even the purported basis to begin offering these services
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'CD-ROM Delivery', 'proeth:description': 'The CD-ROM is delivered and physically available'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Unauthorized Service Offering', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A begins actively marketing and providing facilities design and construction services'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: direct
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#CausalChain_f65651a1",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer A orders the CD-ROM and begins to offer facilities design and construction services.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "The CD-ROM is delivered and physically available",
      "proeth:element": "CD-ROM Delivery",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A begins actively marketing and providing facilities design and construction services",
      "proeth:element": "Unauthorized Service Offering",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "CD-ROM Delivery",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the delivered CD-ROM as the foundation, Engineer A would have lacked even the purported basis to begin offering these services",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Unauthorized Service Offering",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Physical availability of the CD-ROM tool",
    "Engineer A\u0027s intent to enter the facilities design and construction market",
    "Engineer A\u0027s reliance on the CD-ROM as his competency basis"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Possession of the tool + Engineer A\u0027s decision to market services he believed it enabled"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

Causal Language: Simply sign and return this letter today and you'll be among the first engineers to see how this full-featured interactive library of standard design can help you work faster than ever and increase your firm's profits.

Necessary Factors (NESS):
  • Receipt of the direct mail solicitation advertising the CD-ROM
  • Marketing claims that design experience was unnecessary ('no matter your design experience')
  • Engineer A's willingness to respond to the solicitation
Sufficient Factors:
  • Compelling marketing message + Engineer A's interest in expanding services + low barrier to ordering (sign and return letter)
Counterfactual Test: Without receiving the solicitation promising competency 'no matter your design experience,' Engineer A would not have ordered the CD-ROM to pursue unfamiliar facilities design work
Responsibility Attribution:

Agent: Engineer A
Type: direct
Within Agent Control: Yes

Causal Sequence:
  1. Solicitation Receipt
    Engineer A receives direct mail advertising a CD-ROM claiming any engineer can design any project regardless of experience
  2. Promotional Material Acceptance
    Engineer A reads and accepts the premise that pointing and clicking can substitute for design experience
  3. Competency Shortcut Purchase
    Engineer A orders the CD-ROM, implicitly accepting its premise
Field classification (triples vs literals)
Relations (structural triples)
  • cause: Solicitation Receipt
  • effect: Competency Shortcut Purchase
  • responsibleAgent: Engineer A
Literal extractions (kept for synthesis)
  • causalLanguage content: Simply sign and return this letter today and you'll be among the first engineers to see how this full-featured interactive library of standard design can help you work faster than ever and increase your firm's profits.
  • necessaryFactors content: Receipt of the direct mail solicitation advertising the CD-ROM; Marketing claims that design experience was unnecessary ('no matter your design experience'); Engineer A's willingness to respond to the solicitation
  • sufficientFactors content: Compelling marketing message + Engineer A's interest in expanding services + low barrier to ordering (sign and return letter)
  • counterfactual content: Without receiving the solicitation promising competency 'no matter your design experience,' Engineer A would not have ordered the CD-ROM to pursue unfamiliar facilities design work
  • causalSequence content: {'proeth:step': 1, 'proeth:element': 'Solicitation Receipt', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A receives direct mail advertising a CD-ROM claiming any engineer can design any project regardless of experience'}; {'proeth:step': 2, 'proeth:element': 'Promotional Material Acceptance', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A reads and accepts the premise that pointing and clicking can substitute for design experience'}; {'proeth:step': 3, 'proeth:element': 'Competency Shortcut Purchase', 'proeth:description': 'Engineer A orders the CD-ROM, implicitly accepting its premise'}
  • responsibilityType assessment: direct
  • withinAgentControl assessment: True
RDF JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/cases/121#CausalChain_00c07c3d",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Simply sign and return this letter today and you\u0027ll be among the first engineers to see how this full-featured interactive library of standard design can help you work faster than ever and increase your firm\u0027s profits.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A receives direct mail advertising a CD-ROM claiming any engineer can design any project regardless of experience",
      "proeth:element": "Solicitation Receipt",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A reads and accepts the premise that pointing and clicking can substitute for design experience",
      "proeth:element": "Promotional Material Acceptance",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer A orders the CD-ROM, implicitly accepting its premise",
      "proeth:element": "Competency Shortcut Purchase",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Solicitation Receipt",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without receiving the solicitation promising competency \u0027no matter your design experience,\u0027 Engineer A would not have ordered the CD-ROM to pursue unfamiliar facilities design work",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Competency Shortcut Purchase",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Receipt of the direct mail solicitation advertising the CD-ROM",
    "Marketing claims that design experience was unnecessary (\u0027no matter your design experience\u0027)",
    "Engineer A\u0027s willingness to respond to the solicitation"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer A",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Compelling marketing message + Engineer A\u0027s interest in expanding services + low barrier to ordering (sign and return letter)"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}
Allen Temporal Relations (6)
Interval algebra relationships with OWL-Time standard properties
From Entity Allen Relation To Entity OWL-Time Property Evidence
Engineer A lacking facilities design experience before
Entity1 is before Entity2
Engineer A receiving the CD-ROM solicitation time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore
Engineer A, a chemical engineer with no facilities design and construction experience, receives a so... [more]
Engineer A receiving the CD-ROM solicitation before
Entity1 is before Entity2
Engineer A ordering the CD-ROM time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore
Engineer A, a chemical engineer with no facilities design and construction experience, receives a so... [more]
Engineer A ordering the CD-ROM before
Entity1 is before Entity2
Engineer A offering facilities design and construction services time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore
Engineer A orders the CD-ROM and begins to offer facilities design and construction services.
design/build project work by Engineer A overlaps
Entity1 starts before Entity2 and ends during Entity2
structural footing design by Engineer B time:intervalOverlaps
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalOverlaps
Engineer A, a professional engineer, worked with a construction contractor on a design/build project... [more]
Engineer B's structural footing design during
Entity1 occurs entirely within the duration of Entity2
construction of the industrial facility time:intervalDuring
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalDuring
During the construction of the project, the construction contractor separately retained the services... [more]
consulting firm's interview with public utility before
Entity1 is before Entity2
firm's attempt to alter its qualifications time:intervalBefore
http://www.w3.org/2006/time#intervalBefore
the firm sought to alter its qualifications following its interview with the public utility in order... [more]
About Allen Relations & OWL-Time

Allen's Interval Algebra provides 13 basic temporal relations between intervals. These relations are mapped to OWL-Time standard properties for interoperability with Semantic Web temporal reasoning systems and SPARQL queries.

Each relation includes both a ProEthica custom property and a time:* OWL-Time property for maximum compatibility.