{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Contract_Acceptance",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer L accepts a contract with Client X to design a stormwater management system for a large development, with a scope that includes ensuring stormwater will not impact the community drinking water source.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Licensed Professional Engineer",
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Faithful Agent Obligation"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Faithful Agent Principle",
    "Public Safety Health and Welfare Principle"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Engineer-Client Contractual Relationship"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Provide competent stormwater management design that protects the community drinking water source",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Stormwater control design expertise"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Project outset",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 1,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Engineer L is contracted by Client X, a private development entity, to design a stormwater management system for a large residential and commercial development near a small community.",
    "Part of Engineer L\u2019s scope of work for Client X includes ensuring that stormwater from the new development will not impact this primary drinking water source for the community."
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Contract Acceptance"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Work_Suspension_Request",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Client X, facing unexpected financial setbacks, requests that Engineer L suspend the work identified in the original contract.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Private Development Entity",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Delay in quantifying and addressing stormwater risk"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Client X",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Work Suspension State"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Reduce expenditures during financial difficulty by pausing contracted design work",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "During preliminary design phase, at time of financial setback",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 4,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Client X encounters unexpected financial setbacks and requests that Engineer L suspend work identified in the original contract"
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Work Suspension Request"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Nondisclosure_at_Suspension",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "In communications about the suspension, Engineer L does not mention to Client X the potential increased risk of impact to the community drinking water source, complying with the suspension request without disclosing the unquantified concern. The BER finds this disclosure was not required because the concern had not risen to the level of fact.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Licensed Professional Engineer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Client remains unaware of the potential increased risk during suspension"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Faithful Agent Obligation",
    "Opinions Founded on Facts Obligation"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Faithful Agent Principle"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Undisclosed Unquantified Risk Concern"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Respect the client\u0027s good faith request to stop design work",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Professional judgment on disclosure thresholds"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "At time of Client X\u0027s suspension request",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 5,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "In their communications about the suspension, Engineer L does not mention to Client X the potential increased risk of impact to the community drinking water source.",
    "while it might be prudent for Engineer L to inform Client X of their concerns, such disclosure is not required under the Code"
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Nondisclosure at Suspension"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Work_Resumption",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "When Client X\u0027s financial situation improves, Engineer L agrees to resume work on the stormwater management system.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Licensed Professional Engineer",
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Faithful Agent Obligation"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Faithful Agent Principle"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Active Design Work State"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Complete the contracted stormwater management design",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Stormwater control design expertise"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Several months after suspension",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 7,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Work Suspension State"
  ],
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Several months later, Client X\u2019s financial situation improves and Engineer L is asked to resume work on the stormwater management system."
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Work Resumption"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Risk_Study_Conduct",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Following the historic heavy rainfall, Engineer L conducts additional studies and qualitatively estimates the risk that stormwater runoff from the development could reach the nearby watershed and community drinking water source.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Licensed Professional Engineer",
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Opinions Founded on Facts Obligation"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Public Safety Health and Welfare Principle"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Runoff Risk Established as Fact"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Establish a factual basis for assessing the runoff risk to the drinking water source",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [
    "Public Safety Paramountcy Obligation"
  ],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Stormwater risk analysis",
    "Qualitative risk estimation"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Upon resumption of work, after the historic heavy rainfall",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 10,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Engineer L conducts additional studies and qualitatively estimates the risk that heavy rainfall could lead to stormwater runoff from the development reaching the nearby watershed and community drinking water source.",
    "Engineer L\u2019s identification of runoff risk is now \u201cfact.\u201d"
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Risk Study Conduct"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Risk_Notification",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Engineer L notifies Client X of the identified runoff risk and advises that additional protective measures should be considered, noting that local environmental standards require steps to safeguard public water sources.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Licensed Professional Engineer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Client resistance due to budget limitations"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Faithful Agent Obligation",
    "Opinions Founded on Facts Obligation"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Public Safety Health and Welfare Principle",
    "Faithful Agent Principle"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Risk Disclosed to Client"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Inform the client of the established risk and prompt investment in protective measures",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [
    "Public Safety Paramountcy Obligation",
    "Project Success Advisement Obligation"
  ],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Risk communication",
    "Knowledge of local environmental standards"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After completing the additional studies",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 12,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Undisclosed Unquantified Risk Concern"
  ],
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Engineer L notifies Client X of this risk, advising that additional protective measures should be considered, especially as local environmental standards require steps to safeguard public water sources.",
    "Consistent with Code sections I.4, II.3.a, II.3.b, III.1.b, and III.3.a, Engineer L notified Client X of this risk."
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Risk Notification"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Safeguard_Refusal",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Client X, citing continuing budget limitations, refuses to invest in additional protective measures and insists on proceeding without added safeguards, stating that compliance issues will be addressed later, if needed.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Private Development Entity",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Risk of stormwater runoff reaching the community drinking water source",
    "Potential noncompliance with local environmental standards"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Client X",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Client Refusal of Safeguards",
    "Engineer\u0027s Ethical Dilemma"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Proceed with the project while avoiding the cost of additional protective measures",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After Engineer L\u0027s risk notification",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 13,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Client X is hesitant to invest in additional protective measures, citing continuing budget limitations.",
    "Despite Engineer L\u2019s concerns, Client X insists on proceeding without added safeguards, stating that Client X will address any compliance issues later, if needed."
  ],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": false,
  "rdfs:label": "Safeguard Refusal"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Refusal_to_Acquiesce",
  "@type": "proeth:Action",
  "proeth:description": "Per the BER\u0027s conclusion, Engineer L must not continue work on the project while Client X refuses to invest in the protective measures Engineer L identified. Ethically acquiescing to the client\u0027s insistence is treated as impermissible conduct.",
  "proeth:eventRoleContext": "Licensed Professional Engineer",
  "proeth:foreseenUnintendedEffects": [
    "Conflict with the client and possible loss of the engagement"
  ],
  "proeth:fulfillsObligation": [
    "Public Safety Paramountcy Obligation",
    "Project Success Advisement Obligation"
  ],
  "proeth:guidedByPrinciple": [
    "Public Safety Health and Welfare Principle"
  ],
  "proeth:hasAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:hasMentalState": "deliberate",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Withheld Professional Participation"
  ],
  "proeth:intendedOutcome": "Hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public by not enabling a project lacking required safeguards",
  "proeth:raisesObligation": [],
  "proeth:requiresCapability": [
    "Professional ethical judgment"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Present, unresolved endpoint after Client X\u0027s refusal",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 14,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Active Design Work State"
  ],
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Engineer L cannot ethically acquiesce to Client X\u2019s insistence to continue work on the project when Client X refuses to invest in the protective measures identified by Engineer L."
  ],
  "proeth:violatesObligation": [],
  "proeth:withinCompetence": true,
  "rdfs:label": "Refusal to Acquiesce"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Event_Risk_Concern_Emergence",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Contract_Acceptance",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.85",
  "proeth:description": "During the preliminary design phase, Engineer L becomes concerned that risk of impact to the community drinking water source will potentially increase over time, before the risk can be quantified.",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Unquantified Risk Concern"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "During the preliminary design phase",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 2,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "During the preliminary design phase, Engineer L becomes concerned that the risk of impact to the community drinking water source will potentially increase, as the likelihood of heavy stormwater flows will increase over time."
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Risk Concern Emergence"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Event_Client_Financial_Setback",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.95",
  "proeth:description": "Client X encounters unexpected financial setbacks before Engineer L can quantify the increased risk, prompting the request to suspend work under the original contract.",
  "proeth:eventType": "exogenous",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Client Financial Hardship"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Before Engineer L can quantify the increased risk, during preliminary design",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 3,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "But before Engineer L can quantify the increased risk, Client X encounters unexpected financial setbacks and requests that Engineer L suspend work identified in the original contract."
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Client Financial Setback"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Event_Client_Financial_Recovery",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.95",
  "proeth:description": "Several months after the suspension, Client X\u0027s financial situation improves, enabling the request that Engineer L resume work on the stormwater management system.",
  "proeth:eventType": "exogenous",
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Several months after work suspension",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 6,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Client Financial Hardship"
  ],
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Several months later, Client X\u2019s financial situation improves and Engineer L is asked to resume work on the stormwater management system."
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Client Financial Recovery"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Event_Historic_Heavy_Rainfall",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.95",
  "proeth:description": "An historic heavy rainfall occurs in the region around the time work resumes, a natural occurrence outside any case agent\u0027s control.",
  "proeth:eventType": "exogenous",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Increased Stormwater Accumulation"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "About the same time work resumes",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 8,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "About this same time, an historic heavy rainfall in the region leads to increased stormwater accumulation on-site, raising the risk of runoff into the watershed."
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Historic Heavy Rainfall"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Event_Stormwater_Accumulation_Increase",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.9",
  "proeth:description": "The historic rainfall leads to increased stormwater accumulation on the development site, which raises the risk of runoff into the watershed that serves as the community drinking water source.",
  "proeth:eventType": "exogenous",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Elevated Runoff Risk"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "interval",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "Following the historic heavy rainfall, around resumption of work",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 9,
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "an historic heavy rainfall in the region leads to increased stormwater accumulation on-site, raising the risk of runoff into the watershed"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Stormwater Accumulation Increase"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
    "time": "http://www.w3.org/2006/time#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Event_Risk_Established_as_Fact",
  "@type": "proeth:Event",
  "proeth:causedByAction": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#Action_Risk_Study_Conduct",
  "proeth:confidence": "0.85",
  "proeth:description": "Following Engineer L\u0027s additional studies and qualitative estimate, the identified runoff risk attains the status of fact within the case, triggering the disclosure obligations the Board discusses.",
  "proeth:eventType": "outcome",
  "proeth:initiates": [
    "Runoff Risk Known as Fact"
  ],
  "proeth:temporalExtent": "instant",
  "proeth:temporalMarker": "After Engineer L conducts additional studies upon resuming work",
  "proeth:temporalSequence": 11,
  "proeth:terminates": [
    "Unquantified Risk Concern"
  ],
  "proeth:textReferences": [
    "Although it does not appear Engineer L has completed a professional report per se, Engineer L\u2019s identification of runoff risk is now \u201cfact.\u201d"
  ],
  "rdfs:label": "Risk Established as Fact"
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_1",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "During the preliminary design phase, Engineer L becomes concerned that the risk of impact to the community drinking water source will potentially increase, as the likelihood of heavy stormwater flows will increase over time.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L accepts a contract with Client X to design a stormwater management system near a community relying on a surface water watershed",
      "proeth:element": "Contract Acceptance",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L begins preliminary design with a scope requiring protection of the community drinking water source",
      "proeth:element": "Preliminary Design Phase Work",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L becomes concerned that risk of impact to the drinking water source will potentially increase over time",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Concern Emergence",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Contract Acceptance",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without acceptance of the contract and commencement of preliminary design, Engineer L would not have been in a position to develop the concern about increased risk to the drinking water source",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Risk Concern Emergence",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Engineer L contracted to design the stormwater management system",
    "Scope of work including protection of the community drinking water source",
    "Engineer L\u0027s experience enabling recognition of increasing stormwater flow likelihood"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Combination of contracted design work + protective scope requirement + professional expertise applied during preliminary design"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_2",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "But before Engineer L can quantify the increased risk, Client X encounters unexpected financial setbacks and requests that Engineer L suspend work identified in the original contract.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Client X encounters unexpected financial setbacks",
      "proeth:element": "Client Financial Setback",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Client X requests that Engineer L suspend work identified in the original contract",
      "proeth:element": "Work Suspension Request",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Client Financial Setback",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the financial setbacks, Client X would have had no stated reason to request suspension, and the work would likely have continued to the point of risk quantification",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Work Suspension Request",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Unexpected financial setbacks experienced by Client X",
    "Existing contract with ongoing design work that could be suspended"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Client X",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Financial setbacks combined with Client X\u0027s authority over the contracted scope of work"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_3",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "In their communications about the suspension, Engineer L does not mention to Client X the potential increased risk of impact to the community drinking water source.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L becomes concerned about potential increased risk to the drinking water source",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Concern Emergence",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Client X requests suspension before Engineer L can quantify the increased risk",
      "proeth:element": "Work Suspension Request",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L does not mention the potential increased risk in suspension communications",
      "proeth:element": "Nondisclosure at Suspension",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Work Suspension Request",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the suspension request, there would have been no suspension communications in which nondisclosure could occur; work would likely have continued toward quantifying the risk",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Nondisclosure at Suspension",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Suspension communications creating the occasion for possible disclosure",
    "Engineer L\u0027s concern not yet quantified or established as fact",
    "Engineer L\u0027s decision not to raise the concern"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Suspension request + unquantified concern + Engineer L\u0027s judgment that disclosure was not required"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_4",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Several months later, Client X\u0027s financial situation improves and Engineer L is asked to resume work on the stormwater management system.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Client X\u0027s financial situation improves several months after the suspension",
      "proeth:element": "Client Financial Recovery",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Client X asks Engineer L to resume work on the stormwater management system",
      "proeth:element": "Resumption Request",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L resumes work on the stormwater management system",
      "proeth:element": "Work Resumption",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Client Financial Recovery",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the financial recovery, Client X would not have requested resumption and the project would have remained suspended",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Work Resumption",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Improvement in Client X\u0027s financial situation",
    "Existing suspended contract with Engineer L",
    "Engineer L\u0027s willingness to resume the work"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "shared",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Client X",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Financial recovery combined with the standing contractual relationship and Engineer L\u0027s agreement"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_5",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "About this same time, an historic heavy rainfall in the region leads to increased stormwater accumulation on-site, raising the risk of runoff into the watershed.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "An historic heavy rainfall occurs in the region around the time work resumes",
      "proeth:element": "Historic Heavy Rainfall",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Rainfall leads to increased stormwater accumulation on the development site",
      "proeth:element": "Stormwater Accumulation Increase",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Accumulation raises the risk of runoff into the watershed",
      "proeth:element": "Raised Runoff Risk",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Historic Heavy Rainfall",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the historic rainfall, on-site stormwater accumulation would not have increased at that time and the runoff risk would not have been raised",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Stormwater Accumulation Increase",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Occurrence of historic heavy rainfall in the region",
    "Development site conditions capable of accumulating stormwater",
    "Absence of completed stormwater management controls"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "indirect",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "None (natural event)",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Historic rainfall on a site without completed stormwater management measures"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": false
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_6",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Engineer L conducts additional studies and qualitatively estimates the risk that heavy rainfall could lead to stormwater runoff from the development reaching the nearby watershed and community drinking water source.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L resumes work on the stormwater management system",
      "proeth:element": "Work Resumption",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Historic rainfall increases on-site accumulation and raises runoff risk",
      "proeth:element": "Stormwater Accumulation Increase",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L conducts additional studies and qualitatively estimates the runoff risk",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Study Conduct",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Stormwater Accumulation Increase",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the observed accumulation and raised risk, Engineer L\u0027s additional studies would likely not have been undertaken at that time or with the same urgency",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Risk Study Conduct",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Increased on-site stormwater accumulation raising runoff risk",
    "Resumed contractual scope of work",
    "Engineer L\u0027s professional judgment that further study was warranted"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Raised runoff risk combined with resumed design work and Engineer L\u0027s professional diligence"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_7",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Although it does not appear Engineer L has completed a professional report per se, Engineer L\u2019s identification of runoff risk is now \u201cfact.\u201d",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L conducts additional studies and qualitatively estimates the runoff risk",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Study Conduct",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L\u0027s identification of runoff risk attains the status of \u0027fact\u0027 per the BER analysis",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Established as Fact",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Risk Study Conduct",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the additional studies, the risk would have remained an unquantified \u0027concern\u0027 that, per the BER, \u0027does not rise to the technical or moral level of fact\u0027",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:effect": "Risk Established as Fact",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Additional studies conducted by Engineer L",
    "Qualitative estimate of the runoff risk",
    "Professional identification of the risk grounded in study results"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Completion of additional studies producing a qualitative risk estimate"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_8",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "Consistent with Code sections I.4, II.3.a, II.3.b, III.1.b, and III.3.a, Engineer L notified Client X of this risk.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Additional studies establish the runoff risk as fact",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Established as Fact",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L notifies Client X of the risk and advises that additional protective measures should be considered",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Notification",
      "proeth:step": 2
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Risk Established as Fact",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the risk being established as fact, disclosure would not have been required (as in the suspension phase, where the BER found disclosure was \u0027not required under the Code\u0027)",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:effect": "Risk Notification",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Runoff risk established as fact through additional studies",
    "Code obligations requiring disclosure of facts to the client",
    "Engineer L\u0027s decision to notify Client X"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer L",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Established factual risk combined with Engineer L\u0027s Code-based disclosure obligations"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_9",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "However, Client X is hesitant to invest in additional protective measures, citing continuing budget limitations. Despite Engineer L\u2019s concerns, Client X insists on proceeding without added safeguards, stating that Client X will address any compliance issues later, if needed.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L notifies Client X of the runoff risk and advises additional protective measures",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Notification",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Client X is hesitant to invest, citing continuing budget limitations",
      "proeth:element": "Budget-Based Hesitancy",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Client X insists on proceeding without added safeguards, deferring compliance issues",
      "proeth:element": "Safeguard Refusal",
      "proeth:step": 3
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Risk Notification",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "Without the notification, Client X would not have faced an explicit safeguard decision; however, the refusal itself was driven by Client X\u0027s budget constraints and choice, not by the notification",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "facts",
  "proeth:effect": "Safeguard Refusal",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Notification presenting Client X with the decision whether to invest in safeguards",
    "Client X\u0027s continuing budget limitations",
    "Client X\u0027s decision to defer compliance"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "direct",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Client X",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Notified risk + budget limitations + Client X\u0027s willingness to defer compliance issues"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}

{
  "@context": {
    "proeth": "http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#",
    "proeth-case": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#",
    "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
    "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
  },
  "@id": "http://proethica.org/ontology/case/8#CausalChain_10",
  "@type": "proeth:CausalChain",
  "proeth:causalLanguage": "In summary, consistent with BER case precedent and the facts of the instant case, Engineer L cannot ethically acquiesce to Client X\u2019s insistence to continue work on the project when Client X refuses to invest in the protective measures identified by Engineer L.",
  "proeth:causalSequence": [
    {
      "proeth:description": "Additional studies establish the runoff risk to the watershed as fact",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Established as Fact",
      "proeth:step": 1
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Engineer L notifies Client X and advises additional protective measures",
      "proeth:element": "Risk Notification",
      "proeth:step": 2
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Client X refuses to invest in safeguards and insists on proceeding",
      "proeth:element": "Safeguard Refusal",
      "proeth:step": 3
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Conflict between Canon I.1 (public safety paramount) and Canon I.4 (faithful agent) crystallizes",
      "proeth:element": "Ethical Dilemma",
      "proeth:step": 4
    },
    {
      "proeth:description": "Per the BER, Engineer L cannot ethically continue work while Client X refuses protective measures",
      "proeth:element": "Refusal to Acquiesce",
      "proeth:step": 5
    }
  ],
  "proeth:cause": "Safeguard Refusal",
  "proeth:counterfactual": "If Client X had invested in the protective measures, no conflict between Canon I.1 and Canon I.4 would have arisen and Engineer L could ethically have continued the work",
  "proeth:discoveredInSection": "discussion",
  "proeth:effect": "Refusal to Acquiesce",
  "proeth:necessaryFactors": [
    "Client X\u0027s refusal to invest in protective measures",
    "Established factual risk to the community drinking water source",
    "Engineer L\u0027s paramount obligation to public health, safety and welfare under Canon I.1"
  ],
  "proeth:responsibilityType": "shared",
  "proeth:responsibleAgent": "Engineer L (obligation) and Client X (precipitating refusal)",
  "proeth:sufficientFactors": [
    "Client insistence on proceeding without safeguards combined with a factually established public safety risk and the Code\u0027s paramount duty"
  ],
  "proeth:withinAgentControl": true
}