Review of Other Engineer’s Work
Description
Interactive ethical decision scenario generated from case 20. Contains 0 events and 0 decisions. Key participants: Client A, Engineer B, City Administrator.
Participants
Add ParticipantTimeline
2025-09-04 15:58
Event
Time: 2025-09-04 15:58
Type: Performance Issues
Description: During the 3-year contract period, City Administrator questions Engineer B's judgment on several occasions while Engineer B provides consulting services.
Details:
- Origin: llm
- Synthetic: no
Provides context for decision group 1
- Origin: llm
- Synthetic: no
During the 3-year contract period, City Administrator questions Engineer B's judgment on several occasions while Engineer B provides consulting services.
2025-09-04 16:00
Event
Time: 2025-09-04 16:00
Type: Consultation
Description: City Administrator contacts Engineer C to question him on specific issues that Engineer B had worked on for the city.
Details:
- Origin: llm
- Synthetic: no
Provides context for decision group 1
- Origin: llm
- Synthetic: no
City Administrator contacts Engineer C to question him on specific issues that Engineer B had worked on for the city.
2025-09-04 16:02
Event
Time: 2025-09-04 16:02
Type: Realization
Description: Engineer C fully realizes that answering questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining advantage in competition for the next 3-year contract.
Details:
- Origin: llm
- Synthetic: no
Provides context for decision group 1
- Origin: llm
- Synthetic: no
Engineer C fully realizes that answering questions in a certain perspective would be a pretext to gaining advantage in competition for the next 3-year contract.
2025-09-04 16:04
Event
Time: 2025-09-04 16:04
Type: Ethical Violation
Description: Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions and is critical of Engineer B's decisions, potentially without knowing all circumstances.
Details:
- Origin: llm
- Synthetic: no
Provides context for decision group 1
- Origin: llm
- Synthetic: no
Engineer C answers the City Administrator's questions and is critical of Engineer B's decisions, potentially without knowing all circumstances.
2025-09-04 16:07 Decision
Should Engineer C provide critical assessment of Engineer B's work performance when directly asked by the City Administrator while Engineer B is still under active contract?
Type: ethical_decisionOptions:
- Prioritize ethical considerations and professional standards
- Find a solution that addresses multiple stakeholder concerns
- Focus on practical considerations and contractual obligations
Resources
Add ResourceNo resources added yet.