Edit Step4_obligation_relevance Template

Step4_obligation_relevance v2

Viewer

Test Case:

Template

Preview

History

System prompt (optional) User prompt (template)

Analyze these ethical obligations and constraints from an NSPE ethics case.

OBLIGATIONS:
{{ obligations_text }}

CONSTRAINTS:
{{ constraints_text }}

QUESTIONS THE BOARD CONSIDERED:
{{ questions_text }}

BOARD'S CONCLUSIONS:
{{ conclusions_text }}

TASK: Identify which obligations/constraints are DECISION-RELEVANT - meaning they are central to the ethical dilemma and the board's analysis.

Return a JSON object with this structure:
{
  "decision_relevant_indices": [1, 3, 5],  // Indices from the lists above
  "reasoning": "Brief explanation of why these are central to the case"
}

Focus on obligations that:
1. Are directly referenced in the questions or conclusions
2. Create ethical tension or conflict
3. Require the engineer to make a difficult choice

Return ONLY the JSON object, no other text.

Loading preview...

Version History

No version history yet. Save changes to create versions.

Saved

808 chars

Reference

Template Variables

Q-numbered question lines (first 5, 150-char cap)

C-numbered conclusion lines (first 5, 150-char cap)

Indexed obligation lines [n] label: definition (definitions capped at 200 chars)

Indexed constraint lines continuing the obligation numbering

Output Schema

type object

properties

JSON Wrapper

Appended to the prompt by the extractor:

IMPORTANT: Wrap your response as a JSON object with exactly two keys:
{"new_step4_obligation_relevance_classes": [...], "step4_obligation_relevance_individuals": [...]}
If there are no individuals to report, use an empty array for "step4_obligation_relevance_individuals".